State, nation, nationalism and borders in the Danish-German relationship 1820-2020

State, nation, nationalism and borders in the Danish-German relationship 1820-2020 is the first of the four main themes, that will be addressed at the MatchPoints Seminar 2020. This particular theme has these sessions:

Border issues prior to and after 1871 (A)

Time: Thursday April 23 at 08.00-09.30 NB! MORNING SESSION PRE-CONFERENCE OPENING
Auditorium: To be announced
: Professor Steen Bo Frandsen, University of Southern Denmark

To be updated


PhD-student Dean J. Guarnaschelli, St. John’s University, New York:
The Lady and the Dane: Lydia Baer and the championing of J.P. Jacobsen

PhD- student Ryan J. Gesme, University of Tennessee-Knoxville:
To Remain in Our Native Home: Danish and German Reponses to the Deportations of Oberpräsident Köller

Associate Professor Anna Sandberg, University of Copenhagen:
Danish-German Cultural Relations and Danish Nation-Building after 1864

PhD student Frederik Forrai Ørskov, University of Copenhagen:
Germany, the United States of Norden, and European Federalism in Late-19th Century Scandinavist Political Visions

Border issues prior to and after 1871 (B)

Time: Thursday April 23 at 13.15-14.45
Auditorium: To be announced
: Professor Steen Bo Frandsen, University of Southern Denmark

The proclamation of the German Empire in 1871 following the spectacular military triumph over France changed the balance of power in Europe. A new centre emerged in the middle of the continent. As a consequence of the Prussian dominated Reichsgründung, the new German state became associated with military power and economic strength. The traditional picture of a Kulturnation composed of many small states was fading. A growing German self-confidence was met with a stronger reserve by the neighbouring countries, and the nation-building process demanded a clarification of physical and mental borders: Political, economical and cultural borders were re-invented, kinship and relations redefined. In this session, we wish to address the changing map of Europe between 1871 and the First World War.

Associate Professor Jes Fabricius Møller, University of Copenhagen:

Assistant Professor Niels Eichorn, Middle Georgia State University:
Schleswig-Holstein, and Ethnic Divisions: International Politics and Nationalism in the Dano-German Borderland in Revolution and War

Associate Professor Rasmus Glenthøj, University of Southern Denmark:
A Matter of Size: The threshold principle in 19th century nationalism

Associate Professor Jacco Pekelder, Utrecht University:
Contextualising Danish-German Confrontations: Germany’s Neighbours, the German Question, and European Security, 1830-1871

German-Nordic relations and the Re-making of the European Order after 1919

Time: Thursday April 23 at 15.15-16.45
Auditorium: To be announced
Associate Professor Karen Gram-Skjoldager, Aarhus University

1919 is a watershed moment in European history. With the Treaties of Versailles and Saint Germain, Europe’s two central land empires, Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, were broken up, and the nation states that define Europe today emerged out of the peace settlements. This split-up of Europe into nationally defined political entities created a series of new – mainly German – minorities across Europe, and so the year 1919 also marks the beginning of international minority rights regimes. In this session, we wish to address the meaning and consequences of the post-World War I peace settlements for borders and national minorities across Europe.

Senior Lecturer Michael Jonas, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg

Post-doc Jens Lei Wendel-Hansen, University of Southern Denmark:
The 1864 trauma and the political framing of Danish foreign policy 1864-1920

Associate Professor Michael Jonas, University of Hamburg:

Head of Department, Axel Johnsen, Museum Sønderborg:
Political Uses of History: The North Schleswig Unification with Denmark and National Self-Determination

Professor Emeritus Uffe Østergaard, Aarhus University

Germany, Denmark and the New Geopolitical Turn in European Politics

Time: Friday April 24 at 10.30-12.00
Auditorium: To be announced
Chair: Senior Researcher Cecilie Felicia Stokholm Banke, Danish Institute for International Studies

The belief that 1989 not only marked the end of the Cold War, but also the end of history with “the universalisation of Western liberal democracy” has not been able to stand the test of history. As the long-standing liberal consensus on key principles such as free trade, multilateralism and human rights crumbles, and as the system’s liberal superpower embraces a new particularistic outlook encapsulated by “America First”, the international society of states is seemingly reverting to a more traditional nationalist mode of politics characterised by the return of geopolitics and great powers rivalry. This is seen globally, but also more specifically in Europe, where a more assertive Russia, Trump declaring the EU a foe, Chinese investment strategies, Arctic rivalries, and even Brexit point in the direction that European states need to rethink their security and international policies in a very fundamental way. This may prove a real challenge as it might involve a new German responsibility in the field of security, new ways of perceiving security, new political alignments and cooperative frameworks and new efforts to strengthen political and security cooperation in the EU, which will challenge Denmark’s EU security cooperation opt-out.

Associate professor Hagen Schulz-Forberg, Aarhus University:
1989 as an European Geopolitical Turning Point

Professor Anders Wivel, University of Copenhagen:
Germany in Danish Foreign and Security Policy after the Cold War

The German model and its Role in the European Economic Space after 1945

Time: Friday April 24 at 13.15-14.45
Auditorium: To be announced
Associate Professor Rasmus Mariager, University of Copenhagen

1945 is often described as Germany’s Stunde Null, but no more than ten years later, it was rather the German Wirtschaftswunder that captured the headlines. By combining catholic inspired welfare state philosophy and a liberal market, West Germany soon outmatched its Eastern counterpart and re-established itself as the dynamic engine of the Western European economy. However, critics in the OEEC and elsewhere maintained that the economic recipe - later known as the German economic model - consisting of tight state budgets, price stability policies and increasing export surpluses worked well for Germany, but not for Europe. Similar criticism was voiced during the oil crisis of the 1970s, mainly within the EC and the G7, now further sustained by the argument that West Germany had a special responsibility due to its control of the strongest currency of the time, the D-Mark. In other words, it is obvious that the German model has been a topic of discussion long before the establishment of today’s Eurozone. In this workshop, we will focus on the role and perception of the German economic model for the reconstruction and growth of the European post-war economy from 1945 to 1989.

Associate Professor Jan Pedersen, University of Copenhagen
Professor Emmanuel Mourlon-Druol, University of Glasgow